Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Paper Now

Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study
Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice.
Study 3 – Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Study 4 – Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fracture
Suggested Reading
Schreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428.
Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867
Chapter 6 (pp. 131-153), Chapter 7 (pp. 157-185), Chapter 8 (pp. 189-226) Chapter 12 (pp.323-350)& Chapter 13 (pp. 351-380) In Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning
Qualitative Specific Resources
Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 9, p. 229-252
Chapter 14, p. 385-416
Chapter 15, p. 419-442
Additional Instructions:
All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.
Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.
Adhere to APA 7 compliance guidelines.
Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.
Grading Rubric
Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018): Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018): Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). :Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

Evaluates the purpose statement using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018): Evaluates the purpose statement using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Evaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). :Evaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser (2018).: Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser (2018).

Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP. : Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP.

APA 7, Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation: No errors in APA 7, Spelling, and Punctuation.
References: Provides three two or more references.

Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Paper Now