Fin AVIA 400 Final Exam Spring 2014
Fin AVIA 400 Final Exam Spring 2014
Order 100% Plagiarism free paper
Please be extremely careful with this as its 30% of my grade. I will have my phone on standby if you have any questions or need anything else please call or email me right away. I have attached all the lesson i can to better provide you.
AVIA 400 Lesson 4 Handout for discussion preparation
Chapter 7 – Information Processing in Aviation
Higher-Level Processing in Aviation
1. Decision Making
- Rule based behavior
- routine actions
- failure occurs due to forgetting, perhaps during high WL or distractions
- Risky decision making
- Falls into category of knowledge-based behavior
- Two or more plausible choices in the context
- Environment must be considered in making choice
- Outcome of either choice cannot be predicted with certainty
- Certain outcomes may result in harmful consequences
- Ex: continue or turn back in the face of weather
- #1 cause of fatal accidents in GA VFR pilots
- Information processing operations must be proceeded by 2 prior information processing operations:
- Situation assessment (or diagnosis) is necessary to make the best choice
- Cue processing is required to provide an accurate situation assessment
- Evidence is sought, attended and perceived
- Evidence could come from multiple sources
- Linkage is found in the diagnostic value of a cue
- Get a cue, value the cue, make an assessment
- Repeat until situation over
- Naturalistic decision making
- Recognition primed decision – expert does not need separate cues to make situation assessment. Instead, experience dictates what works best.
- Mental simulation – mental simulation of outcomes based on past experience. Therefore, all possible choices need not be considered.
- Mental simulation in preflight planning adds in decision making
- “Skilled pilots are able to avoid situations that require skilled piloting”
- Heuristics and biases
- Less-than-optimal decision making – nonexperts or new problems
- Decision heuristics
- Mental shortcuts often used by experts when time or cognitive resources are in short supply
- Usually provides a good outcome
- May be instances in which the resulting decision leads to a wrong outcome
- Decision biases
- Systematic ways in which decision strategies may ignore features leading to the best decision
- A salient bias is one that dominates cue selection (loud, bright, in the forward view)
- Anchoring heuristic and confirmation bias often go hand in hand to degrade accurate assessment
- Anchoring heuristic applies when cues come sequentially over time to affirm previous cues
- the initial cue becomes the anchor as long as subsequent cues are consistent with the initial cue
- anchoring can feed back into confirmation bias – once an initial assessment is made, people tend to look for cues to affirm the initial assessment rather than seek cues that would prove it wrong
- elimination by aspects heuristic – due to time constraints, avoid considering all options, and only consider those most likely to be best
- framing bias applies when faced with two negative or unpleasant choices
- sure loss vs. risky loss
- tendency is to seek the risky alternative even when the sure loss is a less risky event
- when framed in the positive, the tendency is to reverse the decision, and to choose the sure thing (p. 188)
- sunk cost bias – extension of framing bias. If much has been invested into the risky endeavor, the tendency will be to stick with it rather than take the sure loss; pilot continuing into bad weather rather than turning back.
2. Complex Processing in Context
- human rationality is bounded – Herbert Simon
- they consider only a subset of the information
- they tend to seek satisfactory, rather than optimal solutions
- In other words, they tend to use heuristics (take short cuts), rather than carrying out computationally difficult processes associated with normal modes of rationality
- Experience allows one to jump steps and states of knowledge
- Human information processing tends to be opportunistic and highly influenced by experience and context; human cognition is situated
- Experts develop associations that allow them to recognize situations, rather than analytically interpreting the situation and evaluating options as would be required by novices who haven’t yet learned shortcuts
- With automated systems, the role of the operator has shifted from manual controller to supervisory controller whose primary function is to make high-level or risky decisions and solve problems
Resources for Meeting the Information Processing Challenges in Aviation
- 1. Attention
- Limits of attention to the environment
- i. Selective attention – senses select parts of the environment for processing, while filtering others
- ii. Selection is driven by both internal goals and external events (attention capture)
- iii. Also driven by expectancy – looking where you expect to see a change
- iv. Change blindness – nonsalient events that should be noticed because of their importance, but are not always noticed
- v. Aviation alerts and alarms should be constructed to capture attention
- Limits of attention to the environment
- Divided attention to elements in the environment – four ways in which limits to attention can be overcome
- i. Display integration
- ii. Automaticity – instant recognition of a familiar image or sound (radio call)
- iii. Peripheral and ambient vision
- iv. Multiple resources – able to process sounds and visual cues at the same time
- Selective attention to tasks and goals
- i. Brain cannot multi-task cognitive functions
- ii. Interrupted tasks that are never resumed
- Successful divided attention between tasks and mental processes
- i. Flying and communicating
- ii. Walking, talking, seeing, and juggling
- iii. Different processing areas in the brain – auditory and visual processing
- iv. Limits of attention constrain pilots’ sampling of the environment, and multi-tasking ability
- 2. Expertise
- Acquired through extensive deliberate practice
- Deliberate practice is intensive and involves self-monitoring and error correction with an intent to improve
- Expert-level performance must be actively maintained through continual deliberate practice
- Three stages of skill development
- i. Acquisition of declarative knowledge—knowledge of facts and things
- ii. Acquisition of procedural knowledge—knowledge of how to perform various tasks
- iii. Refinement of production rules that specify action for specific actions
- Brain makes quantitative and qualitative changes in cortical activity as skill develops
- i. As skill develops, the operator relies less on slower controlled processes
- ii. Development of the cortical tissue through training and practice
- iii. Expert’s organization of knowledge is different from the novice
- Expert – organized around principles not readily apparent on the surface
- Novice organized around literal objects and explicit events
- iv. Experts have developed knowledge into long term memory and have devised retrieval cues for eventual access to the information
- v. Experts are able to see meaningful patterns, make inferences from partial information, continuously update their perception of the current situation, and anticipate future conditions
- Duration of job tenure does not directly equate to expertise
- i. Continual development is required
- ii. Desire to improve
- iii. Experts need to learn to apply their highly structured knowledge to strategically arrest the current situation and to reduce future workload
Emergent Processes—Mental Workload and Situation Awareness
- Mental Workload – the mental cost of performing the information processing required by the task performance
- Situation Awareness – the perception of the elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning, and the projection of their status in the near future
- Automation can reduce operator WL while reducing operator SA